[Home]

[RFI Report] [Next Section]

Final SWMU B-20 and B-21 RCRA Facility Investigation Report

Section 1 - Introduction

On May 5, 1999 an Administrative Consent Order was issued to CSSA pursuant to §3008(h) of the SWDA, as amended by RCRA, and further amended by the HSWA of 1984. In accordance with the RFI requirements of the Consent Order, this RFI was conducted to determine the current environmental condition of the SWMU B-20/21 and to recommend further investigations.

This specific RFI was performed by Parsons under the U.S. Air Force AMC Contract F11623-94-D0024, Delivery Order RL33. AFCEE provided technical oversight for the delivery order. Based upon the project SOW, work plans to govern the fieldwork were prepared. These include:

Work Plan Overview

(Volume 1-1, RL33 Addendum);

Site-Specific Work Plan

(Volume 1-2, SWMU B-20/21);

Field Sampling Plan

(Volume 1-4, RL33 Addendum); and

Health and Safety Plan

(Volume 1-5, RL33 Addendum).

For this RFI report, Section 1 provides the site-specific background and target closure standard. Section 2 describes field actions and the closure evaluation. Section 3 summarizes the findings, evaluates attainment of data quality objectives, provides recommendations, and certifies the site closure, if applicable. References cited in this report can be found in the Bibliography (Volume 1-1 of the Environmental Encyclopedia).

Investigations have been on-going at SWMU B-20 since 1994. The results of the first phase of investigation at the site are documented in the Remedial Investigation Report for B-20 Former Open Burn/Open Detonation Area (Parsons ES, 1995d) and results of the second phase are documented in the Addendum to the Remedial Investigation Report (Parsons ES, 1996b). To meet TNRCC closure requirements (described in Section 1.4), the addendum report recommended additional UXO removal activities and remediation of a large volume of contaminated soil. The additional UXO removal activities were the primary task of the current phase of investigation. Since the UXO items were removed when identified, this phase of the investigation is also considered remediation. Based on the current status of SWMU B-20/21, the objectives of this phase of investigation/remediation are to meet requirements of the Consent Order for RFIs, and to continue work towards meeting TNRCC RRS1 closure requirements.

In addition to the Consent Order requirement to conduct an RFI, interim measures are also required to address SWMU B-20/21 soil that has been sifted to remove UXO. Remediation or removal of this contaminated soil is also necessary to meet TNRCC closure requirements. The UXO removal activities are described in this report, but activities related to interim measures and the sifted soil are addressed in the Soil Pile Disposition Assessment Report currently being prepared under a separate delivery order.

1.1 - Background and Site Description

1.1.1   CSSA

General information regarding the history and environmental setting of CSSA are provided in the CSSA Environmental Encyclopedia (Volume 1-1, Background Information Report). In that report, data regarding the geology, hydrology, and physiography are also available for reference.

1.1.2   SWMU B-20/21

1.1.2.1   Site Description

SWMU B-20 is a former OB/OD area used periodically between 1946 and 1987 to treat and dispose of waste ordnance. During that period, ordnance and other waste was detonated, buried, and disposed of on the ground surface at the site. SWMU B-20 consists of approximately 33.5 acres surrounded by wooded areas in the northeastern portion of CSSA (Figure B20/21-1). The area is sparsely vegetated with grasses and cedar shrubs. Gravel roads form the south, west, and north boundaries of the site. Figure B20/21-1 shows an aerial photograph taken of CSSA in 1998.

At the time that investigations began at SWMU B-20 in 1994, site features included an inactive bunker west of the western gravel road; a standpipe, reportedly used on one occasion for the static firing of a rocket motor; and an electrical junction box in the central portion of the site. Broken aboveground conduit was visible in the central-southeast area of the site. Fifteen craters were identified in the northern and central portions of the site. Six of these craters located in the northern portion of the site were presumably used during the early history of the site. Five mounds of soil from the site that were stockpiled for use in covering explosives prior to detonation were present in the eastern portion of the unit. At the time that investigations began, inert metal scrap and UXO was scattered across the entire site. In addition, waste was buried and on the ground surface in the northern portion of the site.

Due to its proximity to the B-20 site, SWMU B-21 was incorporated into the B-20 investigation. SWMU B-21 was a disposal area for small arms ammunition containing shells, shot, and sand originating from the Building 90 Test Fire Room. The B-21 area measures approximately 50 feet by 15 feet, and is located at the southeast tip of SWMU B-20. Two similar small arms ammunition disposal areas were observed within the B-20 site. These areas measured approximately 60 feet by 10 feet and 20 feet by 8 feet.

Background information regarding the location, size, and known historical use of SWMU B-20/21 is also included in Volume 1-2, behind the SWMU B-20/21 tab. This volume also includes a Chronology of Actions and a Site-Specific Work Plan Addendum for SWMU B-20/21.

1.1.2.2   Potential Sources of Contamination

The potential sources of contamination at SWMU B-20/21 are burned or buried waste consisting primarily of ammunition and debris from ammunition detonation. CSSA records indicate the B-20 site was used for detonation of conventional explosive ordnance and other ordnance items, static downward firing of one rocket motor, disposal of scrap metal from detonation activities, and disposal of small arms ammunition. SWMU B-21 was a disposal area for small arms ammunition, containing shells, shot, and sand originating from building 90 and the rifle range. Additional information regarding types of ordnance items disposed at the site is included in Section 2.2.2 of the Remedial Investigation Report (Parsons ES, 1995d).

Contaminants of potential concern include metals, explosives, and perchlorates. Previous investigations at the site included VOC and SVOC analyses; however, these compounds were not detected in any of the soil samples collected at the site. The last phase of investigation at the site identified 2,4-TNT, arsenic, barium, cadmium, lead, and mercury in soil or rock at concentrations above RRS1 levels.

1.1.2.3   Site Location

SWMU B-20/21 is located within the North Pasture area of the outer cantonment (Figure B20/21-1). The SWMU is approximately 1,500 feet west of the eastern facility boundary and 2,000 feet south of the northern boundary. Well CS-I, the nearest well to the site, is located about 800 feet to the east. SWMU B-24 is located approximately 2,100 feet southwest of the site and RMU 5 is located approximately 400 feet to the west. Gravel roads form the west, south, and north perimeters of the SWMU.

1.2 - Environmental Setting

1.2.1   Site Soils and Topography

There are three soil types at SWMU B-20/21. The majority of the site is covered with Crawford and Bexar soils (Figure B20/21-2). A small area in the eastern portion of the site is covered by Krum Complex soils and in the northern and western portions of the site, Brackett-Tarrant Association soils are present. The Krum Complex soils receive sediments and runoff from higher elevation soils and permeability is very slow. Crawford and Bexar soils occur in broad, nearly level to gently undulating areas with slopes of 0 to 5 percent. The soils are stony, very dark gray to dark reddish brown, noncalcareous clay, about 8 inches thick. Brackett-Tarrant Association soils are formed on hills with 8 to 30 percent slopes and consist primarily of soils that developed over limestone. Most CSSA soils are typically calcareous clay, ranging in depth from 4 to 60 inches and are underlain by limestone. SWMU B-20/21 appears to be fairly typical, with silty clay observed to depths ranging from 0.5 to 11 feet bgs and underlain by limestone. Detailed descriptions of the CSSA soil types are provided in the Environmental Encyclopedia (Volume 1-1, Background Information Report, Soils and Geology).

The elevation of the site ranges from approximately 1,370 feet above sea level on the western side of the site, to approximately 1,310 feet above sea level on the eastern side of the site (Figure B20/21-2). Except on the far east side of the site, the ground slopes gently to the east, dropping approximately 10 feet in elevation every 100 feet. On the east side of the site, the ground surface slopes to the northwest. The site is vegetated with native grasses, isolated clusters of live oak stands, and juniper.

1.2.2   Geology

The Upper Glen Rose is the uppermost geologic stratum in the SWMU B-20/21 area (Figure B20/21-3). The Upper Glen Rose consists of beds of blue shale, limestone, and marly limestone, with occasional gypsum beds. Generally, it outcrops in stream valleys and at the ground surface where soils are poorly developed or eroded. The Upper Glen Rose is estimated to be up to 150 feet thick at CSSA. It is underlain by the Lower Glen Rose, which is estimated to be 300 feet thick beneath CSSA. The Lower Glen Rose is a massive, fossiliferous, vuggy limestone that grades upwards into thin beds of limestone, marl, and shale. The Lower Glen Rose is underlain by the Bexar Shale facies of the Hensell Sand, which is estimated to be from 60 to 150 feet thick under the CSSA area. The Bexar Shale consists of silty dolomite, marl, calcareous shale, and shaley limestone. The geologic strata dip approximately 10 to 12 degrees to the south-southeast at CSSA.

Based on current published information, there are known to be two major fault (shatter) zones at CSSA: the North Fault Zone and the South Fault Zone. The SWMU B-20/21 area is located north of both of these zones (Figure B20/21-3). Additional information on structural geology at CSSA can be found in the Environmental Encyclopedia (Soils and Geology, Background Information Report, Volume 1-1).

In soil borings drilled at SWMU B-20 during previous investigations, the Upper Glen Rose Limestone was encountered at depths ranging from 0.5 feet to 11 feet bgs. The white to very light gray limestone contained fossils of pelecypods and gastropods, solution cavities, and calcite veins. Soil boring logs are provided in Appendix E of the Remedial Investigation Report for B-20 (Parsons ES, 1995d).

1.2.3   Hydrology

At CSSA, the uppermost hydrogeologic layer is the unconfined Upper Trinity aquifer, which consists of the Upper Glen Rose Limestone. Locally at CSSA, low-yielding perched zones of groundwater can exist in the Upper Glen Rose. During drilling at SWMU B-20 in 1994, perched groundwater was encountered at a depth of 10.5 feet in a soil boring drilled adjacent to the bed of the unnamed creek that crosses the east side of the site. No water was encountered in any of the other site borings.

Transmissivity values are not available for the Upper Glen Rose. Regionally, groundwater flow is thought to be enhanced along the bedding contacts between marl and limestone, however, the hydraulic conductivity between beds is thought to be poor. This interpretation is based on the observation that static well levels are discordant in adjacent wells completed at approximately the same elevation. Principle development of solution channels is limited to evaporite layers in the Upper Glen Rose Limestone. Groundwater discharge occurs predominantly via natural springs, seeps, and pumping. Regionally, groundwater flow appears to be to the southeast.

The Middle Trinity aquifer is unconfined and functions as the primary source of groundwater at CSSA. It consists of the Lower Glen Rose Limestone, the Bexar Shale, and the Cow Creek Limestone. The Lower Glen Rose Limestone outcrops north of CSSA along Cibolo Creek and within the central and southwest portions of CSSA. Principle recharge into the Middle Trinity aquifer is via precipitation infiltration at outcrops. At CSSA, the Bexar Shale is interpreted as a confining layer, except where it is fractured and faulted, therefore allowing vertical flow from the up-dip Cow Creek Limestone into the overlying, but down-dip Lower Glen Rose. Fractures and faults within the Bexar Shale may allow hydraulic communication between the Lower Glen Rose and Cow Creek Limestones. Groundwater flow within the Middle Trinity aquifer is toward the south and southeast and the average transmissivity coefficient is 1,700 gpd/ft (Ashworth, 1983). In general, groundwater at CSSA flows in a north to south direction, with some seasonal fluctuations. However, local flow gradient may vary depending on rainfall, recharge, and possibly well pumping.

The nearest water well is Well CS-I, located approximately 800 feet northeast of SWMU B-20/21. Well CS-I is used for watering livestock and is operated by a windmill. The nearest off-site water well, RFR-2, is located over one mile northwest of the site. Groundwater levels within Well CS-I typically range from 102 to 200 feet bgs, but have exceeded 260 feet bgs during periods of drought. COPCs detected above AFCEE RLs in Well CS-I include barium, copper, lead, and zinc. Additional information regarding the water wells at CSSA is presented in the Environmental Encyclopedia (Volume 5).

Drainage at the B-20 site is generally to the northeast in two runoff channels within the Cibolo Creek watershed. The larger channel begins just north of the gravel road at the southern site boundary, drains into a small pond, and continues northeast to the livestock pond (Tank I). Groundwater from Well CS-I feeds into the tank/pond northeast of B-20/21. The surface area of the pond is less than one acre. An earthen dam exceeding six feet in height causes the collection of surface water in the livestock pond. The smaller channel runs northeast along the eastern site boundary until it branches into the larger channel. Both channels are ephemeral, and the small on-site pond is dry during periods of little to no precipitation. Water remains at the livestock pond (Tank I) during dry periods due to the pumping of Well CS-I. Due to higher elevations north, west, and south of the site, these two channels receive all site runoff.

1.2.4   Cultural Resources

Cultural resources are prehistoric and historic sites, structures, districts, artifacts, or any other physical evidence of human activity considered important to a culture, subculture, or community for scientific, traditional, or religious purposes. The nearest cultural site to SWMU B-20/21 is a burnt rock midden located north of SWMU B-24.

1.2.5   Potential Receptors

A land use survey discussing local and possible future uses of groundwater and surface water, a water well survey, and sensitive environmental areas at CSSA was completed during December 15 and 16, 1999. The results of this survey, along with results from a more in-depth survey to identify potential receptors, points of human exposure, and possible constituent pathways is presented in Section 3 of the Technical Approach Document for Risk Evaluation (Volume 1-6).

Land within 0.25-mile of SWMU B-20/21 is classified as "Evergreen Forest Land" in Figure 1.1 of the Technical Approach Document for Risk Evaluation. There are no buildings within 0.25-mile of the site, but Well CS-I, which is used for watering livestock, is located approximately 800 feet to the northeast. Well CS-MW3-LGR, a groundwater monitoring well, is located approximately 3,500 feet south and downgradient of SWMU B-20/21. The nearest residential area is approximately one mile west of SWMU B-20/21. In addition, Fair Oaks Elementary School is over one mile northwest of the site.

A small herd of cattle, maintained on CSSA by the USDA-ARC, roam freely throughout selected areas of the Inner Cantonment and the North Pasture. Additionally, wild game species, including white-tailed deer, axis deer, and wild turkey, roam freely throughout CSSA. A map of the deer hunting stands which overlook mechanical feeders and planted food plots is located in Figure 5.2 of the Technical Approach Document for Risk Evaluation (Volume 1-6). SWMU B-20/21 is located within an area where hunting is allowed. Deer blinds 28, 29, 30 and 33 are all within 1,000 feet, and blind 32 is within 1,500 feet of the site.

Four water reservoirs are maintained at CSSA for the purpose of sport fishing. Two of the reservoirs are located in the northwestern and northeastern portions of the North Pasture while the other two are located near the western boundary of the Inner Cantonment. One reservoir, known as Tank I, is located approximately 500 feet east of SWMU B-20/21 and is fed by the small stream that bisects the eastern portion of the B-20/21 site.

The nearest potential habitats for local endangered species (Figure 11, Volume 1-1, Background Information Report) are 2,000 feet to the southwest (Black-Capped Vireo) and 600 feet to the northwest (Golden-Cheeked Warbler).

1.3 - Previous Investigations

Investigation of SWMU B-20/21 began in February 1994, after EPA issued a Compliance Order in June 1993 requiring preparation and implementation of a closure plan for the site. A chronology of actions at SWMU B-20/21 is located in Volume 1-2 and Volume 3-1, behind the SWMU B-20/21 tab of the Environmental Encyclopedia. Investigations at the site prior to the current RFI activities included a geophysical survey, UXO removal, advancement of soil borings, collection of environmental samples from surface soil, subsurface soils, sediments, surface water and groundwater samples.

1.3.1   Preliminary Screening, 1994

In January and February 1994, the Red River Army Depot (RRAD) responded to the Compliance Order by collecting preliminary samples to provide an estimation of the nature and extent of contamination for environmental investigation planning purposes. Samples were collected from areas of possible contamination, including from within four craters, near one soil mound, from the small on-site pond, and from the livestock pond to the northeast.

No explosives were detected in any of the samples. Arsenic in three surface soil samples exceeded RRS2 criteria. Barium, cadmium, and lead in the surface water sample collected from the small on-site pond exceeded freshwater criteria (30 TAC 307). Additional information regarding this preliminary sampling is included in Section 2.4 of the Remedial Investigation Report (Parsons ES, 1995d).

1.3.2   Phase I Remedial Investigation, 1994-1995

In March 1994, the Partial Facility Closure Plan, B-20 Detonation Area (Parsons ES 1994) was submitted to USEPA Region VI. The first phase of the investigation was conducted in November and December 1994. The purposes of the first phase of the investigation were to determine if any UXO items remained at the site and to determine if chemicals had been released. The scope of the investigation included sampling of surface soil, subsurface soil and rock, sediment, surface water, and groundwater, and removal of UXO on the ground surface. Results of the investigation are summarized below. Detailed descriptions of results can be found in the Remedial Investigation Report for B-20 (Parsons ES, 1995d).

The explosives analyses conducted during this investigation were performed by ITS Laboratories in Richmond, Texas. In 1999, due to unacceptable practices by ITS, the EPA determined that the analytical results were questionable and therefore, could not be used to document site conditions.

1.3.2.1   UXO Removal

A total of 193 UXO items were found during the first phase of the investigation. Most items were fragments of ordnance containing explosive residue. Some of the items were chunks of raw explosive. The majority (162 of 193) of the items were found within the original site boundary, but a substantial portion (31 of 193) was found outside the original boundary. All UXO identified at the site was found on the ground surface. The UXO Specialists indicated that this UXO probably blasted out of the craters during detonation. Ordnance detonated in a crater can be blasted several hundred feet, explaining why some UXO items were found up to 55 feet from the site.

To address the possibility of buried UXO in the craters, magnetic surveys were conducted at each crater. The magnetometer was used in areas most likely to contain buried UXO (craters) rather than across the entire site due to interference caused by the large amount of scrap metal at the site. Magnetic anomalies were identified in 10 of the 15 craters.

Although the entire B-20 site and much of the surrounding area was methodically swept for UXO items, vegetation obstructed visual identification of UXO items on the surface. The RI report concluded that additional UXO items likely remained on the ground surface, and potentially existed in the subsurface at the craters.

1.3.2.2   Surface Soil Sampling

A total of 43 surface soil samples were collected at the site during the RI. Metals levels in eighteen of the 43 samples exceeded background (RRS1) criteria. Analytes exceeding background levels included arsenic, barium, cadmium, lead, and mercury. In addition, 2,4-TNT was detected above the PQL in one sample. These exceedances were detected in the following areas:

Two small ammunition disposal areas in the northern portion of the site;

SWMU B-21 small ammunition disposal area on the east side of the site;

A large area in the west-central portion of the site covering as much as 20 percent of the site; and

In the immediate vicinity of one surface soil sample location (SS19), where TNT was detected.

All of these areas, except the large area in the west-central portion of the site, also exceeded RRS2 criteria.

1.3.2.3   Subsurface Soil Sampling

Metals levels in several borings exceeded RRS1 and RRS2 criteria. Since most of these samples were collected within rock and since groundwater was not encountered during drilling of these borings, the RI report concluded that it is unlikely that these metals levels would have an adverse affect on human health or the environment. At the time that the RI report was prepared, arsenic and mercury were identified as metals exceeding RRS1 criteria. However, background levels have since been revised, and lead levels detected in three soil borings also now exceed RRS1 criteria.

1.3.2.4   Sediment, Surface Water, and Groundwater Sampling

No contaminants were detected in the natural surface water features at the site (the ephemeral stream and the small pond). However, during the investigation, water was present in several craters; and contaminants in this water exceeded RRS2 criteria. Sediments at one crater exceeded RRS1 metals concentrations. Sediment samples were also collected from two other craters, the ephemeral stream crossing the site, the small on-site pond, and the livestock pond northeast of the site.

A groundwater sample was collected at one boring where groundwater was encountered. All analyte concentrations were below MCLs.

1.3.3   Phase II Remedial Investigation, 1995-1996

Phase II of the remedial investigation was initiated in September 1995 and included additional surface soil sampling, drilling and sampling of three soil borings, and additional UXO clearance activities. Amendments to the project plans were prepared in September (Parsons ES, 1995f) and December 1995 (Parsons ES, 1995g). Results of the investigation are summarized below. Detailed descriptions of results can be found in the Addendum to the Remedial Investigation Report for B-20 (Parsons ES, 1996b).

1.3.3.1   UXO Removal

UXO removal activities during the second phase of the investigation included vegetation reduction and removal activities within and around the site, additional surface sweeps within the site after vegetation reduction, surface sweeps in areas outside the boundary, and subsurface UXO removal in the northern six-acre area of the site.

UXO specialists from UXB International used a Schodstedt GA-52B Locator, a magnetometer which identifies ferrous items up to a depth of 10 feet, to aid in UXO identification. The boundaries of the area outside the site were defined by conflagration patterns identified during the first phase of the RI, review of historical aerial photographs, and field identification of UXO.

In December 1995, subsurface magnetic anomalies in the northern portion of the site (which was divided into eight grids) and also in the 15 craters were excavated and removed. While the craters in the southern portion of the site contained very little buried debris, the northern portion of the site was found to contain a significant amount of buried debris, including some UXO. These items were identified with a Foerster Ferek (Mk-26) Ordnance Locator, flagged for later excavation, and removed during a field effort that lasted until March 1996. Over 37,000 magnetic contacts were identified in the portion of the area that was surveyed. These contacts were caused by clay lenses, metal-containing debris such as cans and wire, and, to a small extent, UXO. A total of 300 subsurface UXO items were identified in the area investigated. In addition, 19,000 pounds of scrap metal were excavated and removed. UXO found during the phase II investigation was destroyed during detonations on January 31, 1996 and May 6, 1996.

Because so many magnetic contacts were encountered during the subsurface UXO removal activities in the northern portion of the site, only six of the eight grids could be cleared due to budget constraints. Therefore, the addendum report recommended additional subsurface UXO removal activities at the site. Because the area had apparently been used for solid waste disposal, the report concluded that RRS1 closure would be possible if the waste was left in place.

1.3.3.2   Surface Soil Sampling

Additional surface soil samples were collected in the south-central portion of the site to aid in the delineation of the extent of metals exceeding background concentrations in that area. In areas where raw TNT was observed, surface soil samples were collected and analyzed for explosives using immunoassay testing procedures to assess the extent of contamination associated with such items.

Results of the surface soil metals analyses identified areas where background metals concentrations were exceeded. These results indicated that estimated 17,900 yd3 of soil exceed background concentrations in the south-central portion of the site. A map from the Phase II RI which shows the areas with above-background levels of metals contamination (using 1997 background levels, which have since changed) is included in Appendix G. The results also revealed that the extent of metal contamination had not been completely defined to the south of the site. Results for the immunoassay testing of the soils for explosives indicated that the extent of contamination in the vicinity of the raw TNT was very limited and, therefore, the presence of these items at the site has not resulted in widespread contamination by explosive constituents.

The addendum report made three recommendations for addressing contaminated surface soils at the site:

Three small ammunition disposal areas and associated metals-contaminated soil should be removed. The estimated volume of material associated with these areas was 200 cubic yards.

A treatability study should be conducted to evaluate remedial alternatives for the large volume of soil exceeding RRS1 criteria.

A controlled burn should be conducted for vegetation removal. This burn may result in the destruction of the very low levels of TNT detected in very small areas of surface soil. Following the burn, verification sampling was recommended.

1.3.3.3   Subsurface Soil Sampling

Three soils boring were performed near previous investigative borings exceeding background concentrations for arsenic, mercury, and lead. Rock samples collected from the three soil boring were submitted for SPLP and TCLP analysis to assess the potential for releases of leachate in excess of the groundwater concentration standards.

Neither arsenic nor mercury was detected in leachate recovered from these samples. A high level of lead (0.054 mg/L) was detected in the leachate from one boring. The action level for lead is 0.015 mg/L.

The addendum report recommended that contaminated subsurface material be removed or remediated when the solid waste disposal areas are closed.

1.4 - Closure Standard

As described in Section 4.3 of the Risk Assessment Technical Approach Document (Volume 1-6), CSSA has opted to pursue closure of SWMU B-20/21 under the Risk Reduction Rule (30 TAC §335). If the site concentrations do not exceed background, then the site will be closed using RRS1. If the site exceeds background, then a determination will be made regarding the feasibility of cleaning the site to meet background concentrations. If the decision is made to clean the site to background, closure under RRS1 will be sought. However, if it is determined that the site cannot be closed to meet background concentrations, then the site will be closed under TRRP. A notification of intent to close sites identified to date (including SWMU B-20/21) in accordance with the former RRR was sent to the TNRCC on July 12, 1999. TNRCC acceptance of this notification was received on October 5, 1999.

RRS1 requires that the site be closed following removal or decontamination of waste, waste residues, and contaminated operation system components; and demonstration of attainment of cleanup levels (30 TAC §335.554). If closure requirements under RRS1 are attained and approved by the TNRCC Executive Director, then the owner is released from the deed recordation requirement.

Since the COCs for SWMU B-20/21 are explosives and metals, the cleanup levels are the RLs for explosives, and the background levels for metals. Background metals levels were statistically calculated for CSSA soils and the Glen Rose Limestone, and are reported in the Second Revision to the Evaluation of Background Metals Concentrations in Soil Types (Parsons, February 2002). TNRCC approved the background metals levels presented in the report in April 2002.

[Next Section]