[Home] [Master Table of Contents]
Field Demonstration Work Plan for ESTCP Project 20020 - PIMS - Remediation of Soil Contaminated with Lead at CSSA, June 2001
Table of Contents
1.2 Objectives of the Demonstration
1.4 Stakeholder/End-User Issues
Section 2 - Technology Description
2.1 Technology Development and Application
2.2 Previous Testing of the Technology
2.3 Factors Affecting Cost and Performance
2.4 Advantages and Limitations of the Technology
Section 3 - Demonstration Design
3.3 Test Site History/Characteristics
3.5 Pre-Demonstration Testing and Analysis
3.6 Testing and Evaluation Plan
3.6.1 Demonstration Set-Up and Start-Up
3.6.3 Amount /Treatment Rate of Material to be Treated
3.7 Selection of Analytical/Testing Methods
3.8 Selection of Analytical/Testing Laboratory
Section 4 - Performance Assessment
4.2 Performance Confirmation Methods
4.3 Data Analysis, Interpretation, and Evaluation
Section 6 - Implementation Issues
6.2.1 Current and Planned Interactions With Regulators and Public Participation
Appendices
Appendix A Summary of Previous Investigation Results
Appendix B Analytical Methods Supporting Experimental Design
Appendix C Sampling and Analysis Plan
Appendix D Analytical methods Supporting the Sampling Plan
Appendix E Quality Assurance Project Plan
Appendix F Health and Safety Plan
Figures
Figure 2.1 PIMS Soil Mixing for Pb Stabilization
Figure 2.2 Breakthrough of Dissolved Zinc
Figure 3.1 Regional Location Map, Camp Stanley Storage Activity
Figure 3.2 Site Map - B-20 Former OB/OD Area, June 1996, Camp Stanley Storage Activity
Figure 3.3 Results from the Batch Leach Tests Using the SPLP Solution
Figure 3.4 Results from the Batch Leach Tests Using the TCLP Solution
Figure 4.1 SWMU Remediation Site
Tables
Table 2.1 Stability of Apatite Minerals
Table 2.2 Chronological Summary of Development of the Technology
Table 2.3 Results of Batch Leach Tests
Table 3.1 Performance Objectives
Table 3.2 Activities at Site B-20
Table 3.3 Metal Concentrations in the Tap Water used as Irrigation Water
Table 4.1 Performance Criteria
Table 4.2 Expected Performance and Performance Confirmation Methods