[Home]
SWMU Oxidation Pond (O-1)
Table 2b - Deep Soil Boring Analytical Results, November 1999
Sample ID |
O1-SB5 |
O1-SB5 |
O1-SB6 |
O1-SB6 |
O1-SB100d |
O1-SB7 |
O1-SB7e |
O1-SB8e |
O1-SB8e |
O1-SB9e |
O1-SB9e |
|||||||||||||||||
Depth (ft) |
6.0-6.5 |
26.0-27.0 |
4.0-4.7 |
26.0-27.0 |
26.0-27.0 |
12.5-13.0 |
26.0-27.0 |
5.0-6.0 |
26.0-27.0 |
5.5-6.0 |
26.0-27.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
Soil Type |
Tarrant |
Glen Rose |
Tarrant |
Glen Rose |
Glen Rose |
Tarrant |
Glen Rose |
Tarrant |
Glen Rose |
Tarrant |
Glen Rose |
|||||||||||||||||
Date Collected |
11/4/99 |
11/4/99 |
11/4/99 |
11/4/99 |
11/4/99 |
11/4/99 |
11/8/99 |
11/5/99 |
11/5/99 |
11/5/99 |
11/5/99 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Comparison Criteria |
Sample Analytical Results |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Constituent |
Lab MDLa |
Lab RL |
Back-groundb Tarrant |
Back-ground Glen Rose |
RRS2-GWPc |
RRS2-SAIc |
||||||||||||||||||||||
VOCs, SW8260B (mg/kg): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tetrachloroethene |
0.00016 |
0.007 |
-- |
-- |
0.5 |
17 |
0.1854 |
M |
0.0026 |
M |
0.0238 |
M |
0.0006 |
M |
0.0013 |
M |
0.00016 |
M |
0.0028 |
R* |
0.0014 |
R* |
0.00016 |
R* |
0.0801 |
R* |
0.00016 |
R* |
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene |
0.00021 |
0.006 |
-- |
-- |
7 |
20,000 |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
0.00021 |
M |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene |
0.00024 |
0.003 |
-- |
-- |
10 |
41,000 |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
0.00024 |
U |
Trichloroethene |
0.0002 |
0.01 |
-- |
-- |
0.5 |
6.6 |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
0.0002 |
M |
Vinyl Chloride |
0.00026 |
0.009 |
-- |
-- |
0.2 |
0.007 |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
0.00026 |
M |
Toluene |
0.00015 |
0.005 |
-- |
-- |
100 |
2,400 |
0.002 |
F |
0.0255 |
J |
0.0014 |
F |
0.0025 |
F |
0.0266 |
J |
0.0017 |
F |
0.0026 |
F |
0.0015 |
F |
0.0029 |
F |
0.0017 |
F |
0.0088 |
|
m,p-Xylenes |
0.0002 |
0.007 |
-- |
-- |
1,000 |
3,300 |
0.00022 |
U |
0.0081 |
0.00022 |
U |
0.00022 |
U |
0.0012 |
F |
0.00022 |
U |
0.00022 |
R* |
0.00022 |
R* |
0.00022 |
R* |
0.00022 |
R* |
0.0006 |
R* |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Metals (mg/kg): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cadmium, SW7131A |
0.022 |
0.1 |
0.45 |
2.00 |
0.50 |
1,000 |
0.32 |
M |
0.022 |
M |
0.38 |
M |
0.13 |
M |
0.04 |
M |
0.04 |
M |
0.022 |
M |
0.022 |
M |
0.03 |
M |
0.07 |
M |
0.022 |
M |
Chromium, SW6010A |
0.08 |
20 |
39.9 |
3.1 |
10 |
240,000 |
42.8 |
M |
5.5 |
M |
85.4 |
M |
5.7 |
M |
4.1 |
M |
11.0 |
M |
4.7 |
M |
10.6 |
M |
8.3 |
M |
24.3 |
M |
5.2 |
M |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Solids (%): |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
85.9% |
94.3% |
85.2% |
90.3% |
89.7% |
87.6% |
86.8% |
87.4% |
87.0% |
86.0% |
91.8% |
|||||||||||
Notes: All samples analyzed by O'Brien & Gere Laboratory, Syracuse, New York. a MDLs were not adjusted for moisture content. b Background values from Evaluation of Background Metals Concentrations in Soil Types at Camp Stanley Storage Activity, June 1996. c Industrial risk reduction standards for groundwater protection and soil-air ingestion. d Duplicate sample. e Sample was reanalyzed, and all analyte results were rejected in the reanalysis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concentrations exceeding RRS1 background levels are in bold type. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concentrations exceeding RRS2 standards are highlighted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Due to the high alkalinity of the soil, Parsons ES is requesting to use this data. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AFCEE QAPP 3.0 Data Qualifiers: U The analyte was analyzed for, but not detected. The associated numerical value is at or below the MDL. F The analyte was positively identified but the assocaited numerical value is below the RL. M A matrix effect was present. R The data are unusable due to deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and meet QC criteria. J The analyte was positively identified, the quantitaation is an estimation. |