Objective 1: Meet TNRCC Requirements for Site Closure

Attainment of Risk Reduction Standard Number 1: Closure/Remediation to Background

Remove all hazardous and nonhazardous waste and waste residues and contaminated design and operating system components such as liners, leachate collection systems, and dikes from the unit or area of the unauthorized discharge. For remediation of media that have become contaminated by releases from a waste management unit or by other unauthorized discharge of hazardous or nonhazardous waste, the contaminated media must be removed or decontaminated to cleanup levels specified in this section (30 TAC 335.554(b) and (c)).

Geophysical survey results reported no anomalies associated with waste management activities. The two detected anomalies were related to abandoned equipment from wells CS-B and CS-C. Soil gas survey results indicated that chlorinated VOCs were present at AOC 39 at very low concentrations. No VOCs were detected in surface soil samples.

Yes. There is no evidence of buried waste at the site. No VOCs were detected in surface samples that were collected from the top two feet of soil.

Close the site under RRS1.

Determine compliance with RRS1 closure requirements by comparing to background as represented by results of analyses of samples taken from media that are unaffected by waste management or industrial activities. If the practical quantitation limit (PQL) is greater than background, then the PQL rather than background shall be used as the cleanup level provided that the person satisfactorily demonstrates to the executive director that lower levels of quantitation of a contaminant are not possible (30 TAC 335.554(d)).

Contaminant concentrations were compared to RLs, which are equivalent to PQLs.

Yes. No contaminants were detected above RLs.

Close the site under RRS1.

Attainment of cleanup levels shall be demonstrated by collection and analysis of samples from the media of concern (30 TAC 335.554(e)).

Surface samples were collected at the site and analyzed for contaminants of potential concern 1,1-DCE, cis-1,2-DCE, trans-1,2-DCE, PCE, and TCE.

Yes. No contaminants were detected above RLs.

Close the site under RRS1.

Objective 2: Meet Requirements of 3008(h) Order for RFI

RFI Workplan Requirements

Field Sampling (Detailed listing of methods and procedures are provided in project plans which are incorporated by reference).

Conduct field sampling in accordance with procedures defined in the project work plan, SAP, QAPP, and HSP.

All sampling was conducted in accordance with the procedures described in the project plans.

Yes.

NA

Facility Investigation

Characterization of Environmental Setting - Hydrogeology (B.3.A.1)

Evaluate hydrogeologic conditions at the site.

NA

NA

Characterization of Environmental Setting- Soils (B.3.A.2)

Characterize soils in accordance with USCS soil classification system (B.3.A.2(a)).

Soil types at the site are based on the SCS Bexar County Soil Survey (USDA, 1991) and are described in Section 1.2.1.

Yes

NA

Determine soil pH (B.3.A.2(e)).

The pH of each of the soil types evaluated as part of the background metals concentration study was determined through laboratory analysis. According to those analyses, the pH of Krum Complex, Trinity and Frio and Brackett-Tarrant soils are 7.87, 7.90 and 8.11, respectively.

Yes.

NA

Determine moisture content (B.3.A.2(g)).

The moisture content of each sample was analyzed. Moisture content values are provided in laboratory data packages.

Yes.

NA

Characterization of Environmental Setting – Surface Water and Sediment (B.3.A.3)

Characterize marshes, creeks, wetland areas, or ditches at the site.

The nearest surface water body to AOC 39 is a tributary of Salado Creek which flows south along the eastern boundary of AOC 39. This tributary merges with another to the southeast of AOC 39 and they flow southward where they join Salado Creek.

Yes

NA

Source Characterization (B.3.B)

Identify the source area (B.3.B.1).

A description of the source area is provided in Section 1.1.2.2.

Based on CSSA records and investigation results, there is no source of contamination at AOC39.

NA

Identify the location of the unit/disposal area (B.3.B.2(a)).

In March 1999, points along the boundary of each site were surveyed with a Rockwell Plugger GPS unit (estimated accuracy of ±25 feet). The measurement points were identified by the CSSA Environmental Coordinator. The boundary of the site was confirmed and adjusted, if necessary, based on observations made during the field investigation.

Yes. Although the accuracy of the boundary survey of the site is estimated to have an approximate error of 25 feet, this accuracy is sufficient for closure under RRS1.

NA

Identify the type of unit/disposal area (B.3.B.2(b)).

An EM geophysical survey and soil gas survey were conducted to investigate the source of COCs detected at Well 16.

Based on CSSA records and investigation results, there is no disposal area within AOC39.

NA

Identify design features (B.3.A.2(c)).

Information regarding design features was obtained during the Environmental Assessment (ES, 1992) and through visual observation during the field investigation. All available information regarding the usage/design of the disposal site is provided in Section 1.1.2.2.

Based on CSSA records and investigation results, there is no disposal area within AOC39.

NA

Identification of past and present operating practices, period of operation, age of unit/disposal area, and method used to close the unit/disposal area (B.3.B.2(d), (e), (f), and (h)).

All known information regarding these items is provided in Section 1.1. This information is from the Environmental Assessment, records review, interviews, aerial photo review, and visual observations.

Yes, to the extent possible with the data available.

NA

Determine general physical conditions of the site (B.3.B.2(g))

The general physical condition of the site was determined during the field investigation. This information is presented in Section 1.1.2.

Yes.

NA

Identify waste characteristics, including type of waste placed in the unit, physical and chemical characteristics of the wastes, and migration and dispersal characteristics of the waste (B.3.B.3).

Records regarding historic waste disposal practices at CSSA are very limited. All known information, derived from the Environmental Assessment, records review, interviews, and visual observations at the site is provided in Section 1.1.2.

Yes

NA

Contamination Characterization – Groundwater (B.3.C.1)

Characterize the vertical and horizontal extent of groundwater contamination.

NA

NA

Contamination Characterization – Soil (B.3.C.2)

Determine vertical and horizontal extent of contamination (B.3.C.2(a)).

Surface samples were collected in areas thought to contain contamination.

Yes. No contamination was detected.

NA

Describe soil properties (B.3.C.2(c)).

See “Characterization of Environmental Setting – Soils” above and Section 1.2.1.

Yes

NA

Identify the direction of contaminant movement (B.3.C.2(d)).

No action taken because no contamination was detected.

NA

NA

Extrapolate future contaminant movement (B.3.C.2(e)).

No action taken because no contamination was detected.

NA

NA

Implement a soil boring investigation to determine the extent of soil contamination. Soil gas monitoring will be performed during drilling of all borings. Laboratory analysis of borings for contaminants of potential concern will be performed on soils at depths where either visual contamination is evident, or soil gas concentrations indicate contamination. All boreholes shall be properly abandoned.

Not included in this phase of the RFI at AOC 39. Further subsurface investigation was not indicated at AOC 39 as all confirmation surface soil samples reported concentrations of COCs less than RLs.

A soil boring investigation is not considered necessary because there is no evidence of buried waste at the site.

NA

Prepare a map of all areas included in the investigation (B.3.C.2(i)).

Figures included in this report show all areas included in the investigation.

Yes

NA

All reporting limits should be below regulatory criteria.

RLs were approved by TNRCC on October 5, 1999. RLs are considered RRS1 standards for all analytes except metals.

Yes

NA

Perform all analyses in accordance with the AFCEE QAPP.

All analyses were performed in accordance with the AFCEE QAPP and approved variances.

Yes

NA

All data flagged with “U,” “F,” “M,” and “J” are considered usable for site characterization purposes.

Yes

NA

Contaminant Characterization – Sediment and Surface Water (B.3.C.3)

Conduct a surface water and sediment investigation to characterize contamination resulting from releases at the facility.

AOC 39 is located in the central portion of CSSA. The only surface water bodies at AOC 39 are two ephemeral creeks located to the east of AOC 39. These creeks merge and flow south to join Salado Creek. No surface water sampling was conducted.

Yes. No contamination was detected in the surface soil samples that were collected and there is no evidence of buried waste; therefore, a surface waster and sediment investigation is not warranted.

NA

Potential Receptors (B.3.D).

Collect the information necessary to describe the human populations and environmental systems that are susceptible to contamination exposure from the facility.

Information regarding receptors is provided in the Risk Assessment Technical Approach document (Volume 1-6). In addition, the Well Research Report identified private groundwater users within 0.25 miles and public water suppliers within 0.5 miles of CSSA.

Yes

NA