[Home]
Activity |
Objectives |
Action |
Objective
Attained? |
Recommendations |
Objective 1: Meet TNRCC Requirements for Site Closure |
||||
Attainment of Risk Reduction Standard Number 1: Closure/Remediation to Background |
||||
|
Remove all hazardous and nonhazardous waste and
waste residues and contaminated design and operating system components
such as liners, leachate collection systems, and dikes from the unit or
area of the unauthorized discharge. For
remediation of media that have become contaminated by releases from a
waste management unit or by other unauthorized discharge of hazardous or
nonhazardous waste, the contaminated media must be removed or
decontaminated to cleanup levels specified in this section (30 TAC
335.554(b) and (c)). |
Waste on site was removed and surface soil
samples were collected to determine of and waste residue remained.
A geophysical survey was conducted to determine if there is
evidence of buried waste at the site.
|
Yes. Brass
associated with small arms ammunitions and other metal debris which was
disposed of at the site was removed in 1997 during UXO sweeping. Surface soil samples collected at the site indicated no
remaining waste residue. The
geophysical survey indicated that there are no electromagnetic anomalies
at the site, therefore, buried waste is not suspected. |
RRS1 site closure is recommended. |
|
Determine compliance with RRS1 closure
requirements by comparing to background as represented by results of
analyses of samples taken from media that are unaffected by waste
management or industrial activities.
If the practical quantitation limit (PQL) is greater than
background, then the PQL rather than background shall be used as the
cleanup level provided that the person satisfactorily demonstrates to the
executive director that lower levels of quantitation of a contaminant are
not possible (30 TAC 335.554(d)). |
Contaminant concentrations were compared to the
second revised background levels (Parsons, February 2002) or PQLs. |
Yes. All
results were below background metals levels or reporting limits. |
RRS1 site closure is recommended. |
|
Attainment of cleanup levels shall be
demonstrated by collection and analysis of samples from the media of
concern (30 TAC 335.554(e)). |
Surface soil samples were collected at the site
and analyzed for contaminants of potential concern, including metals, VOCs,
and SVOCs. |
Yes. See
above. |
RRS1 site closure is recommended. |
Objective 2: Meet Requirements of 3008(h) Order for RFI |
||||
RFI Workplan Requirements |
||||
Field
Sampling (Detailed listing of
methods and procedures are provided in project plans which are
incorporated by reference). |
Conduct
field sampling in accordance with procedures defined in the project work
plan, SAP, QAPP, and HSP. |
All
sampling was conducted in accordance with the procedures described in the
project plans. |
Yes.
|
NA |
Facility Investigation |
||||
Characterization
of Environmental Setting - Hydrogeology (B.3.A.1) |
Evaluate
hydrogeologic conditions at the site. |
Not
included in this phase of the RFI at the SWMU B-7 area.
Groundwater
of the Trinity Aquifer is being addressed through the Groundwater
Investigation. |
NA |
NA |
Characterization
of Environmental Setting- Soils (B.3.A.2) |
Characterize
soils in accordance with USCS soil classification system (B.3.A.2(a)). |
Soil
types at the site are based on the SCS Bexar County Soil Survey (USDA,
1991) and are described in Section 1.2.1.
|
Yes. |
NA |
Determine
soil pH (B.3.A.2(e)). |
The
pH of each of the soil types evaluated as part of the background metals
concentration study was determined through laboratory analysis.
According to those analyses, the pH of Tarrant Association, gently
undulating soils is 8.08. |
Yes. |
NA |
|
Determine
moisture content (B.3.A.2(g)). |
The
moisture content of each sample was analyzed.
|
Yes. |
NA |
|
Characterize
marshes, creeks, wetland areas, or ditches at the site. |
No
marshes, wetland areas, or ditches are present at the site.
An intermittent creek is located 400 feet northwest of SWMU B-7.
Direction of runoff flow has been evaluated in Section 1.2.1.
|
Yes |
NA |
|
Characterization
of Environmental Setting – Surface Water and Sediment (B.3.A.3) |
Identify
the source area (B.3.B.1). |
A
description of the potential source area is provided in Section 1.1.2.2. |
Yes.
Sampling at the site was biased toward areas most suspected of
contamination. None of the
samples collected exceeded closure criteria.
|
NA |
Source
Characterization (B.3.B) |
Identify
the location of the unit/disposal area (B.3.B.2(a)). |
The
boundaries were initially marked from aerial photographs, and confirmed by
field investigations. |
Yes.
Although the accuracy of the boundary survey of the site is
estimated to have an approximate error of 25 feet, this accuracy is
sufficient for closure under RRS1. |
NA |
Identify
the type of unit/disposal area (B.3.B.2(b)). |
Information
regarding the type of unit was obtained during the Environmental
Assessment (ES 1992). In addition, the presence of weapons crates, packing, and
small caliber ammunition observed to be scattered at the site during a
field investigation provided initial evidence that a waste disposal site
was potentially present. |
Yes.
A geophysical survey and surface soil sampling were performed.
No evidence of buried waste was found, and surface soil samples
indicated no waste residue on the surface. |
RRS1
site closure is recommended. |
|
Identify
design features (B.3.A.2(c)). |
Information
regarding design features was obtained during the Environmental Assessment
(ES, 1992) and through visual observation during the field investigation.
All available information regarding the design of the disposal site
is provided in Section 1.1.2.1. |
Yes.
All investigations evidence indicates that the site was used for
surface disposal of a small amount of weapon crates, packing, and
ammunition, all of which have been removed. |
NA |
|
Identification
of past and present operating practices, period of operation, age of
unit/disposal area, and method used to close the unit/disposal area
(B.3.B.2(d), (e), (f), and (h)). |
All
known information regarding these items is provided in Section 1.1.2.1.
This information is from the Environmental Assessment, and visual
observations. |
Yes,
to the extent possible with data available. |
NA |
|
Determine
general physical conditions of the site (B.3.B.2(g)) |
The
general physical condition of the site was determined during the field
investigation. This
information is presented in Section 1.1.2.3. |
Yes. |
NA |
|
Identify
waste characteristics, including type of waste placed in the unit,
physical and chemical characteristics of the wastes, and migration and
dispersal characteristics of the waste (B.3.B.3). |
Records
regarding historic waste disposal practices at CSSA are very limited.
All known information, derived from the Environmental Assessment,
records review, interviews, and visual observations at the site is
provided in Section 1.3. |
Yes,
to the extent possible with the data available. |
NA |
|
Contamination
Characterization – Soil (B.3.C.2) |
Determine
vertical and horizontal extent of contamination (B.3.C.2(a)). |
Surface
soil samples were collected to determine horizontal extent of
contamination, if any. Subsurface
soils were not evaluated because there was no evidence that waste was
buried at the site. |
Yes.
No contamination above RRS1 criteria was reported. |
NA |
Describe
contaminant and soil properties with the contaminant source area,
including contaminant solubility, speciation, adsorption, leachability,
exchange capacity, biodegradability, hydrolysis, photolysis, oxidation,
and other factors that might affect contaminant migration and
transformation (B.3.C.2(b)). |
No
samples collected at SWMU B-7 exceeded closure criteria. |
NA |
NA |
|
Describe
soil properties (B.3.C.2(c)). |
See
“Characterization of Environmental Setting – Soils” above. |
NA |
NA |
|
Identify
the direction of contaminant movement (B.3.C.2(d)). |
No
samples collected at SWMU B-7 exceeded closure criteria. |
NA |
NA |
|
Extrapolate
future contaminant movement (B.3.C.2(e)). |
No
samples collected at SWMU B-7 exceeded closure criteria. |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Implement
a soil boring investigation to determine the extent of soil contamination.
Soil gas monitoring will be performed during drilling of all
borings. Laboratory analysis
of borings for contaminants of potential concern will be performed on
soils at depths where either visual contamination is evident, or soil gas
concentrations indicate contamination. All boreholes shall be properly abandoned. |
Not
included in this report for SWMU
B-7. A soil boring
investigation is not considered necessary for this site since there is no
evidence of buried waste. |
NA |
NA |
Prepare
a map of all areas included in the investigation (B.3.C.2(i)). |
Figures
included in this report show all areas included in the investigation. |
Yes |
NA |
|
All
reporting limits should be below regulatory criteria. |
RLs
were approved by TNRCC on October 5, 1999.
RLs are considered RRS1 standards for all analytes except metals.
|
Yes |
NA |
|
Perform
all analyses in accordance with the AFCEE QAPP. |
All
analyses were performed in accordance with the AFCEE QAPP and approved
variances. |
Yes |
NA |
|
|
All
data flagged with “U”, “F”, and “J” are considered usable for
site characterization and closure purposes. |
Yes |
NA |
|
No
data was flagged with “R”. |
Yes |
NA |
||
Contaminant
Characterization – Sediment and Surface Water (B.3.C.3) |
Conduct
a surface water and sediment investigation to characterize contamination
resulting from releases at the Facility. |
SWMU
B-7 is located 400 feet southeast of an intermittent creek.
This creek only contains water during and shortly after heavy
precipitation. Therefore,
surface water was not sampled as part of the SWMU B-7 investigation.
Sampling of sediments in association with the SWMU B-7
investigation is not warranted due to the very limited amount of
contamination detected at SWMU B-7. |
NA |
NA |
Potential
Receptors (B.3.D). |
Collect
the information necessary to describe the human populations and
environmental systems that are susceptible to contaminant exposure from
the Facility. |
Information
regarding receptors is provided in the Risk Assessment Technical Approach
Document (Volume 1-6). In
addition, the Well Research Report identifies private groundwater users
within 0.25-mile and public water suppliers within 0.5-mile of CSSA. |
Yes. |
NA |