>
[Home] [Master Table of Contents]
SWMU Oxidation Pond (O-1)
Table 2b - Deep Soil Boring Analytical Results, November 1999
Sample ID | O1-SB5 | O1-SB5 | O1-SB6 | O1-SB6 | O1-SB100d | O1-SB7 | O1-SB7e | O1-SB8e | O1-SB8e | O1-SB9e | O1-SB9e | |||||||||||||||||
Depth (ft) | 6.0-6.5 | 26.0-27.0 | 4.0-4.7 | 26.0-27.0 | 26.0-27.0 | 12.5-13.0 | 26.0-27.0 | 5.0-6.0 | 26.0-27.0 | 5.5-6.0 | 26.0-27.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Soil Type | Tarrant | Glen Rose | Tarrant | Glen Rose | Glen Rose | Tarrant | Glen Rose | Tarrant | Glen Rose | Tarrant | Glen Rose | |||||||||||||||||
Date Collected | 11/4/99 | 11/4/99 | 11/4/99 | 11/4/99 | 11/4/99 | 11/4/99 | 11/8/99 | 11/5/99 | 11/5/99 | 11/5/99 | 11/5/99 | |||||||||||||||||
| Comparison Criteria | Sample Analytical Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Constituent | Lab MDLa | Lab RL | Back-groundb Tarrant | Back-ground Glen Rose | RRS2-GWPc | RRS2-SAIc | ||||||||||||||||||||||
VOCs, SW8260B (mg/kg): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tetrachloroethene | 0.00016 | 0.007 | -- | -- | 0.5 | 17 | 0.1854 | M | 0.0026 | M | 0.0238 | M | 0.0006 | M | 0.0013 | M | 0.00016 | M | 0.0028 | R* | 0.0014 | R* | 0.00016 | R* | 0.0801 | R* | 0.00016 | R* |
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | 0.00021 | 0.006 | -- | -- | 7 | 20,000 | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M | 0.00021 | M |
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | 0.00024 | 0.003 | -- | -- | 10 | 41,000 | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U | 0.00024 | U |
Trichloroethene | 0.0002 | 0.01 | -- | -- | 0.5 | 6.6 | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M | 0.0002 | M |
Vinyl Chloride | 0.00026 | 0.009 | -- | -- | 0.2 | 0.007 | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M | 0.00026 | M |
Toluene | 0.00015 | 0.005 | -- | -- | 100 | 2,400 | 0.002 | F | 0.0255 | J | 0.0014 | F | 0.0025 | F | 0.0266 | J | 0.0017 | F | 0.0026 | F | 0.0015 | F | 0.0029 | F | 0.0017 | F | 0.0088 | |
m,p-Xylenes | 0.0002 | 0.007 | -- | -- | 1,000 | 3,300 | 0.00022 | U | 0.0081 | 0.00022 | U | 0.00022 | U | 0.0012 | F | 0.00022 | U | 0.00022 | R* | 0.00022 | R* | 0.00022 | R* | 0.00022 | R* | 0.0006 | R* | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Metals (mg/kg): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cadmium, SW7131A | 0.022 | 0.1 | 0.45 | 2.00 | 0.50 | 1,000 | 0.32 | M | 0.022 | M | 0.38 | M | 0.13 | M | 0.04 | M | 0.04 | M | 0.022 | M | 0.022 | M | 0.03 | M | 0.07 | M | 0.022 | M |
Chromium, SW6010A | 0.08 | 20 | 39.9 | 3.1 | 10 | 240,000 | 42.8 | M | 5.5 | M | 85.4 | M | 5.7 | M | 4.1 | M | 11.0 | M | 4.7 | M | 10.6 | M | 8.3 | M | 24.3 | M | 5.2 | M |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Solids (%): | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 85.9% | 94.3% | 85.2% | 90.3% | 89.7% | 87.6% | 86.8% | 87.4% | 87.0% | 86.0% | 91.8% | |||||||||||
Notes: All samples analyzed by O'Brien & Gere Laboratory, Syracuse, New York. a MDLs were not adjusted for moisture content. b Background values from Evaluation of Background Metals Concentrations in Soil Types at Camp Stanley Storage Activity, June 1996. c Industrial risk reduction standards for groundwater protection and soil-air ingestion. d Duplicate sample. e Sample was reanalyzed, and all analyte results were rejected in the reanalysis. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concentrations exceeding RRS1 background levels are in bold type. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concentrations exceeding RRS2 standards are highlighted. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Due to the high alkalinity of the soil, Parsons ES is requesting to use this data. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AFCEE QAPP 3.0 Data Qualifiers: U The analyte was analyzed for, but not detected. The associated numerical value is at or below the MDL. F The analyte was positively identified but the assocaited numerical value is below the RL. M A matrix effect was present. R The data are unusable due to deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and meet QC criteria. J The analyte was positively identified, the quantitaation is an estimation. |